From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 22 02:56:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA13061 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 May 1997 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail13.digital.com (mail13.digital.com [192.208.46.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA13052 for ; Thu, 22 May 1997 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT) From: garyj@frt.dec.com Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail13.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.5/1.0/WV) id FAA12621; Thu, 22 May 1997 05:53:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM) id AA31258; Thu, 22 May 1997 11:53:12 +0200 Message-Id: <9705220953.AA31258@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Terry Lambert of Wed, 21 May 97 11:05:37 PDT. Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Subject: Re: pure /proc ps? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 May 97 11:53:12 +0200 X-Mts: smtp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk terry@lambert.org writes: > Personally, I think that 'ps' in the system dump case should be built > into the "crash" proram, not into 'ps', and that 'ps' should use /proc > and that mounting /proc should be as mandatory as I believe mounting > /dev should be. > you have crash working under FreeBSD ? Neat ! Lemme have it ! In case you really mean crash == gdb, I tend to agree. It would be handy to have a ps type command to look at a crash dump. And it shouldn't be too hard to do, really. The basic code is already in kvm-fbsd.c. --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org