From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 29 21:45:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A82D150BD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:45:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01041; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:45:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA00908; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:44:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908300444.WAA00908@harmony.village.org> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Subject: Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Cc: Kris Kirby , "Daniel O'Connor" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 28 Aug 1999 15:45:44 EDT." References: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:44:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Kris Kirby wrote: : > Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps : > through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth : > limited to 256K. I'm hoping the 3C503 is ancient enough that I can slow : > it down by yanking it's 20.0000 MHz crystal oscillator and feeding it a : > lower speed signal. I'm going to walk them down to see just how far I : > can go. After all, 2 Mbps isn't bad, it just requires a little more : > work. : : What about ARCnet? I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get 256kbps or so... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message