Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:36:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227450] [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? Message-ID: <bug-227450-7501-JcUIdBnEpE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227450 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Db59b3443f39d2b7d6c631094fde7723e0= aec1319 commit b59b3443f39d2b7d6c631094fde7723e0aec1319 Author: Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2023-07-23 16:58:42 +0000 Commit: Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2023-08-06 17:17:30 +0000 gif(4): Assert that gif_output() isn't called for EtherIP With the current implementation of if_bridge(4), bridge_enqueue() calls gif_transmit() only. Ensure it stays that way so that the expectations in both drivers are either met or changed accordingly. PR: 227450 (cherry picked from commit 8a0308722372a3ac6a94967ae4fe3123842309e2) sys/net/if_gif.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227450-7501-JcUIdBnEpE>