From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 22:55:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0D216A400 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ritamari.vonostingroup.com [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3330F43D48 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from c-71-227-92-22.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([71.227.92.22] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FOjbc-000CSY-9a; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:57:36 -0500 Message-ID: <442B1057.5000904@vonostingroup.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:55:19 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Pansters References: <200603292344.52149.danny@ricin.com> <48051.192.168.0.10.1143668999.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> <200603292353.15786.danny@ricin.com> In-Reply-To: <200603292353.15786.danny@ricin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vonostingroup.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, fcash@ocis.net Subject: Re: mutually exclusive OPTIONS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:55:27 -0000 Danny Pansters wrote: > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 23:49, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:44 pm, Danny Pansters wrote: >> >>> I'm making a port that has several mutually exclusive compile-time >>> options. I want to present them as OPTIONS as should, but is there a >>> way within the ports framework to ensure that only one (of the 5 >>> possibilities) is selected, or when one of them is the default but >>> then with 4 mutually exclusive OPTIONS if the user needs one of teh >>> non-default options? >>> See ports/95085[1]. Thanks Cheers, Frank [1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/95085