From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 21:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335EC16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 831AF43D41 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO cpe000103d44c07-cm000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (mikej@69.193.222.195 with login) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2004 21:20:05 -0000 Received: from 207.219.213.163 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej); by cpe000103d44c07-cm000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:19:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45876.207.219.213.163.1103231998.squirrel@207.219.213.163> In-Reply-To: References: <41C0AB8E.6040805@norteglobal.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:19:58 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Mitch (Bitblock)" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: 'Elton Machado' Subject: RE: Load Balancing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:20:07 -0000 Mitch (Bitblock) said: > Short answer is "Yes". > > For basic failover, I've used a script which monitors link status and > function (by pinging or connecting to a remote host). Failover is > accomplished by switching the default route. > > Using ipfw fwd statements, you can make both links function at the same > time, using pf, you can supposedly do some sort of load sharing, but I > havne't used pf yet. > Why dont you all do yourselves a favor and go out and buy one of those home dsl/cable modems that have 2 ports and provide load balancing instead.