From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 14:15:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B7C16A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E7243D58; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30056C087; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBC53405C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:15:14 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20050623141514.GD738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050621070427.GA738@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050621090701.GB34406@cell.sick.ru> <20050621105154.GA36538@cell.sick.ru> <42B961B9.7A5856B3@freebsd.org> <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050623104230.GB61389@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Jeremie Le Hen , sam@FreeBSD.org, Andre Oppermann , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, qingli@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic in RELENG_5 UMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:15:07 -0000 Gleb, > What about fixing it step by step? The patch attached to my previous message > fixes the panic report by Jeremie, I suppose. It is race between output > path and input path, that can occur anytime in runtime. FYI, I compiled my kernel with your patch and I have had no panic since then. Note that my previous uptime was multiple tens of days and I haven't done stress tests. But anyway I think your massively parallel arp -d/ping tests are far more significative than my box which only communicates with a couple of settled machines. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >