From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 18 20:37:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C9F106568B for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mx01.netsrc.de (mx01.netsrc.de [89.107.71.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63818FC1A for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jessie.localnet (dslb-088-065-057-061.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.65.57.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.netsrc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAF6192FD9; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:37:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Bernhard Schmidt To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:36:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) References: <20091009170839.142800@gmx.net> <200910181627.38060.bschmidt@techwires.net> <90a5caac0910181241p61850f84l999f18523e30fc01@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <90a5caac0910181241p61850f84l999f18523e30fc01@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910182236.55615.bschmidt@techwires.net> Cc: Lucius Windschuh Subject: Re: Intel WiFi 5100/5300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:37:02 -0000 On Sunday 18 October 2009 21:41:36 Lucius Windschuh wrote: > Hi Bernhard, > I tried your module on my T400 with a PRO/Wireless 5300 and WITNESS, > INVARIANTS enabled. > If the RF kill switch is set to "WLAN disabled", this command sequence [..] Thanks for reporting this, there seems to be an issue in iwn_cleanup(). > BTW: With the RF kill switch set to "WLAN enabled", it works for open > networks. But ifconfig wlan1 list ap did not return my 802.11a access > point. Is this expected? No it's not. I'll noticed that also during the last tests, scanning on 5Ghz channels does not work reliably, setting a fixed channel works though. -- Bernhard