From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 14 21:59:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BF116A4CE
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D40643D33
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:59:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBF5xJeF066437;
	Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:59:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200312150559.hBF5xJeF066437@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:59:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: matthias.andree@gmx.de
In-Reply-To: <20031215024654.GA21917@merlin.emma.line.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [RC1] ext2fs broken?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:59:42 -0000

On 15 Dec, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Steve Kargl wrote:
> 
>> > FreeBSD 5.2 ext2fs currently only works if you do read-only mounts and
>> > umount before shutting down.
>> > 
>> 
>> This statement basically reflects the comment in NOTES.
> 
> "Giving up on N buffers" after read-only mount mustn't happen for any file
> system IMHO, and that's one of the bugs recently seen in 5.2-BETA.

See the message at
<http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031127214229.O78318> where this
was discussed three weeks ago.