From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Feb 29 06:53:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA14442 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from jolt.eng.umd.edu (jolt.eng.umd.edu [129.2.102.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA14437 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from thurston.eng.umd.edu (thurston.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.206]) by jolt.eng.umd.edu (8.7.3/8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26089; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:51:59 -0500 (EST) Received: (from chuckr@localhost) by thurston.eng.umd.edu (8.7.4/8.7) id JAA02101; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:51:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:51:58 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey X-Sender: chuckr@thurston.eng.umd.edu To: invalid opcode cc: Satoshi Asami , thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, adam@veda.is, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doc directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Feb 1996, invalid opcode wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 1996, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > Oh. How would you handle all the ones that are now being stuffed into > > /usr/X11R6/man? > > I see no reason as to why we can't place them in local/share/man > likewise. After all X11 is a port, just as procmail is a port. It > shouldn't recieve any special favoring. OK. I agree on that, always have, but I expect that you're going to hear some opposition pretty soon, because more folks have always disagreed. ========================================================================== Chuck Robey chuckr@eng.umd.edu, I run FreeBSD-current on n3lxx + Journey2 Three Accounts for the Super-users in the sky, Seven for the Operators in their halls of fame, Nine for Ordinary Users doomed to crie, One for the Illegal Cracker with his evil game In the Domains of Internet where the data lie. One Account to rule them all, One Account to watch them, One Account to make them all and in the network bind them.