From owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Tue Mar 21 12:12:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FD7D145A8 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35577786 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AB128482; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E466E28432; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org References: <1490085811-bc1aa9c7b83aeddb9dee198bc4071b35@olivarim.com> <44FBCEF5-6151-46FF-A166-81E7306914CC@sigsegv.be> <58D11201.1000403@quip.cz> <20170321114636.GH64587@home.opsec.eu> <12FB978F-D222-4221-9DE9-40AFB435187C@lists.zabbadoz.net> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <58D1189D.2050201@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <12FB978F-D222-4221-9DE9-40AFB435187C@lists.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:12:17 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote on 2017/03/21 12:56: > On 21 Mar 2017, at 11:46, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> Hi! >> >>>> If you want to filter on it it should work if you add ???device >>>> enc??? to your >>>> kernel config. The man page suggests that should then allow you to >>>> filter IPSec >>>> traffic on enc0. >>> >>> Shouldn't it be included in GENERIC if IPSec is now part of it? >> >> Yes, please include enc in the GENERIC kernel. > > I thought the entire idea of making ipsec loadable was that we don’t > have to ship it in the kernel and have it available? Then sorry for the noise. Miroslav Lachman