From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 23 5:18:53 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2873337B405; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from assar@assaris.sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA38695; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:18:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from assar) To: Dima Dorfman Cc: Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h References: <20010723063501.D2E223E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> From: Assar Westerlund Date: 23 Jul 2001 14:18:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: Dima Dorfman's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2001 23:35:01 -0700" Message-ID: <5lae1vx2hs.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dima Dorfman writes: > In other words, a library with these kinds of functions would be > useful as a port for consumption by people writing scratch programs > which will never see the light of day. They certainly shouldn't be > used in any production-quality programs, such as those found in our > source tree. Pray tell me what is the difference of having the same code in one of our production programs and having the same production program calling a library function? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message