Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:31:19 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not give git a try? (was "Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64") Message-ID: <20110129163119.410349f1@bhuda.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=-VsVpXH-549UNuHcNZfBH_YHrN-9JBpgWh4A8@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=-VsVpXH-549UNuHcNZfBH_YHrN-9JBpgWh4A8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Catching up on mail after a couple of weeks with the flue..... On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:13:46 -0800 Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: > - The one caveat to cvsup/csup that's awesome is its componentization > capability, i.e. being able to selectively download components in src > / ports; I'm not 100% sure but there doesn't appear to be a clear > analog in git. It might be achievable through gits remote.<group> in > git-config, git-remote, etc, but I would need to prototype whether or > not this is true. Since no one else mentioned it - mercurial handles this with subrepos. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110129163119.410349f1>