From owner-freebsd-doc  Sun Jul 30 04:03:33 1995
Return-Path: doc-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA04056
          for doc-outgoing; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:03:33 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA04042
          ; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:03:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA02704; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:02:18 -0700
To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert)
cc: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard), doc@FreeBSD.ORG,
        faq@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: I do not see that this ever made it in to the FAQ?? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 30 Jul 1995 01:03:55 +0200."
             <199507292303.BAA05932@blaise.ibp.fr> 
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:02:18 -0700
Message-ID: <2701.807102138@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: doc-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > 5 Miscellaneous Questions
> > ----------------
> 
> All of these along with Bruce Evans message on slices have been incorpor
> ated in the FAQ (in SGML). John has said the Text version will go away
> soon. Do I have to sync it up with the sgml one ?
> -- 
> Ollivier ROBERT     -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-     roberto@FreeBSD.ORG
>       FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT #5: Fri Jul 14 12:28:04 MET DST 1995

No, you can leave the text versions alone if the changes have already
been folded into the SGML version.

In fact, I would go out of my way to try to completely obsolete a
given file in Text/ and then *remove* the text version so that we
don't have folks making changes to the wrong one! :(

					Jordan