Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 19:24:03 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: fernando@gont.com.ar Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing IPv6 packets towards oneself with routing sockets? Message-ID: <20140807.192403.845244220459089560.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53E2B586.3080700@gont.com.ar> References: <53E2B586.3080700@gont.com.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Aug__7_19_24_03_2014_114)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote in <53E2B586.3080700@gont.com.ar>: fe> However, whenever I lookup an entry for fc00:1::1 with routing sockets, fe> the only entry I obtain is fc00:1::/64 (a network route) rather than fe> fc00:1::1/128 (a host route). As a result, I kind of have to figure out fe> that since fc00:1::1 is my own address, I must override whatever I fe> learned via routing sockets, and just send my packets to loopback. fe> fe> I would assume that I must be doing something wrong, since I would fe> expect the host-specific route (i.e. longest-matching route) to be route fe> learned via routing sockets. And that I shouldn't be implementing this fe> "is the dst address my own address?" hack. fe> fe> Any thoughts? fe> fe> P.S.: I can provide a code snippet if that'd be of any help. RTM_GET should return fc00:1::1/128 with ifp == lo0. Can you show the code you are using? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Aug__7_19_24_03_2014_114)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlPjU8MACgkQTyzT2CeTzy32FgCgqdd3V4Ap0oIXDly2EGDNJarS l4wAnjEF5rCAbRQv1mx5oSsMb4whzt+h =SWGN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Aug__7_19_24_03_2014_114)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140807.192403.845244220459089560.hrs>