From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 11:45:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197FB106566C for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gmx@ross.cx) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05568FC1A for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [92.76.69.32] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1SrpAi-0006y0-8u; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:45:32 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Jakub Lach" References: <20120715234817.fcfb1489.freebsd@edvax.de> <201207171151.q6HBpq8a039504@mail.r-bonomi.com> <201207181247.q6ICl2ev063084@mail.r-bonomi.com> <201207181558.q6IFwM7f033708@fire.js.berklix.net> <201207190253.q6J2r3p0070058@mail.r-bonomi.com> <1342697265790-5728126.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:45:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1342697265790-5728126.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.3/15152/Thu Jul 19 04:05:24 2012) Cc: Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:45:39 -0000 Am 19.07.2012, 13:27 Uhr, schrieb Jakub Lach : > This topic went totally off, but anyway there are interesting bits, > do you say that e.g. Gutmann method is totally unneeded? > You may be interested in the epilogue to Gutmann's paper: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html#Epilogue Quote: "For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected". This was true in 1996, and is still true now." Nice picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MFM_AFM_JANUSZ_REBIS_INFOCENTRE_PL_HDD_MAGNETIC_MEMORY_EVOLUTION.png > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728126.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"