Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:06:38 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mozilla-devel Message-ID: <20040215190638.GF34704@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <402FBADE.10807@dial.pipex.com> References: <402F9115.5040904@dial.pipex.com> <20040215164836.GD34704@toxic.magnesium.net> <1076864025.38761.2.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> <20040215170158.GE34704@toxic.magnesium.net> <402FBADE.10807@dial.pipex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (02.15.2004 @ 1330 PST): Alex Zbyslaw said, in 1.5K: << > If I understand right, Adam is saying that there can't be two ports > "mozilla-1.6", but wasn't Brandon's suggestion to make the devel port > called "mozilla-devel-1.6", then there aren't two ports with the same name > and version? > > There seem to be precedents for this e.g. xemacs-devel-21.5.b15, > gqview-devel-1.3.7 and others. > > If the port were called mozilla-devel, presumably it could either just > point to mozilla, or it could duplicate it (which might make it easier to > maintain when a new devel release does come along). >> end of "Re: mozilla-devel" from Alex Zbyslaw << You might notice that the rest of the message to which you were replying was an explanation of how to do exactly that. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040215190638.GF34704>