From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 20 00:07:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6597F16A4CE; Thu, 20 May 2004 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net
	[207.172.4.61])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4677643D2F; Thu, 20 May 2004 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from adam.mclaurin@gmx.net)
Received: from 146-115-126-186.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com
	([146.115.126.186] helo=jake)
	by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #7)
	id 1BQhe2-0001t4-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 03:07:10 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 03:07:10 -0400
From: Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
To: ports@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, knu@FreeBSD.org
Message-Id: <20040520030710.448ae885.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040520070136.GA62040@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20040520025535.41b274ac.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
	<20040520070136.GA62040@xor.obsecurity.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9-gtk2-20040229 (GTK+ 2.4.1;
	i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: portupgrade misbehavior
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 07:07:38 -0000

On Thu, 20 May 2004 00:01:36 -0700
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:55:35AM -0400, Adam McLaurin wrote:
> 
> > -# uname -a
> > FreeBSD jake 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Mar
> > 30
> > 01:07:47 EST 2004     root@jake:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ESKI  i386
> > 
> > 
> > Why the h*ll did portupgrade try to recompile zsh? I can't think of
> > any
> > logical explanation for this behavior. Perhaps I am missing
> > something
> > simple here; or perhaps I stumbled across a bug in portupgrade (or
> > even
> > ruby) ?
> 
> Is your INDEX out of date?  portupgrade assumes it is up-to-date and
> bases its upgrade decisions on the contents.  Compare the output of
> portversion and pkg_version.
> 
> Kris

-# ls -al /usr/ports/INDEX*
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   5089899 May  1 08:57 /usr/ports/INDEX
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   4947853 Mar 15 18:20 /usr/ports/INDEX-5
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  10911744 Apr  6 01:21 /usr/ports/INDEX.db

Looking at http://www.freshports.org/shells/zsh , the zsh port hasn't
been modified since March 23rd, so I should be OK on that front.


And portversion does also report that zsh is up-to-date:

-# portversion -v |grep -i zsh
zsh-4.2.0                   =  up-to-date with port


-- 
Adam

"satyam, shivam, sundaram"