Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:07:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: CFR: xdr.h fix for xdrproc_t Message-ID: <200006161707.KAA44803@medusa.kfu.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would like to apply this patch: Index: xdr.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/include/rpc/xdr.h,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 xdr.h --- xdr.h 1999/12/29 05:00:44 1.14 +++ xdr.h 2000/06/16 17:05:09 @@ -128,14 +128,14 @@ * The opaque pointer generally points to a structure of the data type * to be decoded. If this pointer is 0, then the type routines should * allocate dynamic storage of the appropriate size and return it. + * + * Sometimes there is a third argument, sometimes not. So for correct + * prototyping, ... is required. */ #ifdef _KERNEL typedef bool_t (*xdrproc_t) __P((XDR *, void *, u_int)); #else -/* - * XXX can't actually prototype it, because some take two args!!! - */ -typedef bool_t (*xdrproc_t) __P((/* XDR *, void *, u_int */)); +typedef bool_t (*xdrproc_t) __P((XDR *, ...)); #endif /* Does anyone forsee any difficulties? Not doing this prevents a product I work on from compiling. gcc complains about the number of arguments because in C++ () prototypes a function that takes NO arguments. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006161707.KAA44803>