From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:17:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862291065670 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimmy@mammothcheese.ca) Received: from smtp121.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp121.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B978FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimmy@mammothcheese.ca) Received: (qmail 18774 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2009 13:17:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?72.138.160.206?) (jimmy@72.138.160.206 with plain) by smtp121.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2009 13:17:12 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: LvT52DMVM1mdyk6rHPXuixepzCxnv_mMPf4XHOV.0nWhlO6B2WIZye.B4o0Q__xINw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4985A0D8.1050603@mammothcheese.ca> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:17:12 -0500 From: James Bailie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Goncharov References: <165364.55705.qm@web39102.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4984F1C7.9040706@mammothcheese.ca> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bf2006a@yahoo.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jimmy@mammothcheese.ca List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:17:14 -0000 I agree with all you say. This sort of thing is the achilles heel of ports. I'd like to see a beta port exist side by side with the old version, for massive ports like X, KDE, etc, until things stabilize. Alex Goncharov wrote: > No -- a patch might (*should*, for this kind of a disruptive change) > be put together: I'd install it on my systems, I'd try it and report > problems, I'd revert back -- easily. This is for many "I"s willing to > be the testers -- we'd repeat this again as many times as necessary, > before the commit. -- James Bailie http://www.mammothcheese.ca