From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:07:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B484106567D for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8778FC17 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so441130vcb.13 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3CvUkCgFJdF4KRlDBu5MXVMWbNoA4Tnxs0BAouwI2DY=; b=ahGZRrkCGcZxxqN8QCm5WDvVJukdRrez1coD+QvN93U5FnhNT0yT4CX3rvqRp27sXH +23PAiETDO1oiRa3o8jvWP3RfCOzz2pu44k0UWF37KWg26Ae1WgZ9tOk9S0G/RcLgLRP fjMynaAkuE9CeIMeMFxBjE1R1oOIcrVGyS8h8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.29.7 with SMTP id f7mr2752743vdh.130.1326568047373; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:07:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.18.204 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:07:27 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [98.199.43.85] In-Reply-To: References: <4F11558E.6010806@restart.be> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:07:27 -0600 Message-ID: From: Andre Goree To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libutempter X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:07:28 -0000 On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Andre Goree wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > >> >> On 14 Jan 2012 18:26, "Andre Goree" wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 04:14:38 -0600, Henri Hennebert >> wrote: >> > >> >> On 01/14/2012 09:47, Andre Goree wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:13 -0600, Andre Goree >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I recently csup'd 9-STABLE and was able to get it working along with >> my >> >>>> custom kernel. I'm now in the process of rebuilding all my ports, >> and >> >>>> I've >> >>>> come across something when running 'portmaster -af' that I can't >> seem to >> >>>> find any information on. >> >>>> >> >>>> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libutempter-1.1.5_1 >> >>>> >> >>>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/libutempter >> >>>> >> >>>> ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >> >>>> ===>>> is now contained in the base system >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the >> >>>> IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. >> >>>> >> >>>> ===>>> Update for libutempter-1.1.5_1 failed >> >>>> ===>>> Aborting update >> >>>> >> >>>> Terminated >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I figure, "ok I'll just delete the package and move on." However, >> there >> >>>> are many packages I have installed that depend on libutemper. I >> would >> >>>> still just proceed with the removal given that the functionality is >> >>>> provided in base now, however I don't want to break all these ports >> and >> >>>> have to deal with the mess when I portmaster -af again. >> >>>> >> >>>> What is the recommended action here? Should I just force exclude >> that >> >>>> port >> >>>> from the upgrade? That's probably the easiest way but I'd have to >> deal >> >>>> with this at some point. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks in advance for any advice >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Andre Goree >> >>>> andre@drenetinfo >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> So I've rebuilt everything that I could, but when I get to the ports >> >>> that depend on libutempter, I get an error that they could not be >> >>> reinstalled due to a failure with libutempter :/ >> >>> >> >>> ---> Skipping 'www/opera' (opera-11.60) because a requisite package >> >>> 'libutempter-1.1.5_1' (sysutils/libutempter) failed (specify -k to >> force) >> >>> ---> Skipping 'www/opera-linuxplugins' (opera-linuxplugins-11.60) >> >>> because a requisite package 'opera-11.60' (www/opera) failed (specify >> -k >> >>> to force) >> >>> ---> Skipping 'deskutils/kdeplasma-addons' (kdeplasma-addons-4.7.3) >> >>> because a requisite package 'kdepimlibs-4.7.3' (deskutils/kdepimlibs4) >> >>> failed (specify -k to force) >> >>> ---> Skipping 'graphics/libkdcraw-kde4' (libkdcraw-4.7.3) because a >> >>> requisite package 'libutempter-1.1.5_1' (sysutils/libutempter) failed >> >>> (specify -k to force) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I installed misc/compat8x, however it informed my that I'd need to add >> >>> "" to the kernel conf. When I try to do that, I'm met with this >> error: >> >>> >> >>> /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/DESKTOPKERN9: unknown option "COMPAT_FREEBSD8" >> >>> *** Error code 1 >> >>> Stop in /usr/src. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Which is weird, because: >> >>> >> >>> [root@desktop src]# uname -r >> >>> 9.0-STABLE >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Meaning I'm certainly running 9.0-STABLE. So what gives re: that >> error >> >>> above about "unknown option"? I even tried to csup source and >> >>> buildworld again, but to no avail -- the error remains. >> >>> >> >>> >> >> I upgrade my ports with portupgrade. >> >> After removing libutempter I just run `pkgdb -Fu' and then >> >> I can proceed with the update of depending ports. >> >> I don't need compat8x. >> >> >> >> Henri >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, yeah upon further research last night I discovered that >> "COMPAT_FREEBSD8" is not kernel option and that compat8x doesn't play a >> role at all in my situation. >> > >> > Also thanks for the suggestion, that worked perfectly! :) >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Just pkg_delete -f it. >> >> >> >> Since it's in base, its absence won't cause a problem. >> >> >> >> Chris >> > >> > >> > >> > Yeah I was mored concerned (erroneously, it would seem) with dependency >> hell rather than missing libs :p After just removing it then doing a >> pkgdb -Fu, I'm good to go. I've done this before in the past with pkg's >> I've removed, so kinda disheartening that I overlooked it for so long, heh. >> I guess I don't fully grasp the relationship between ports and pkgs which >> lead to all this confusion. >> > >> > In any case, it's resolved now, thanks everyone who replied :) >> >> Woah, whatever you do, don't switch TO portupgrade! It does nothing that >> other tools can't, is unmaintained and is unlikely to work with Ruby 1.9, >> and unless that is fixed it's going to die fairly soon. >> >> Chris >> > > Thanks, but I'm not switching TO anything, it's what I've been using and > what I'm comfortable with. What gave the impression that I hadn't already > been using portupgrade? > Oh I see, my original message, lol. Rest assured, all is well. I've already reconciled the differences and pains that each tool cause on each other (i.e., rebuilt my pkgdb & portsdb before using portupgrade to finish upgrading all my ports).