Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--2456600518-732062402-1340169523=:71176
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

> Yes, Clang in general produces slower binaries than gcc.  Is that in dispute or something?  Or is this just repetition in case we
> didn't hear you the first time?

just yesterday i've heard lots of otherwise claim.

> 
> Try thinking of the transition as a step back to take many steps forward.

What exactly step forward it means?
For now i see ONLY politics and aggression after pointing out facts.

This doesn't look like serious behaviour of serious people.

>  Or just change your compiler.
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.

--2456600518-732062402-1340169523=:71176--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176>