From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 10:51:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751E4106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E858FC08; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SdfkG-0002YF-Pp>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:51:44 +0200 Received: from e178032032.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.32] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SdfkG-0008GZ-Jh>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:51:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD47C3A.7050001@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:51:38 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig15EDE7E87D143076CC6F0684" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.32 Cc: Steve Franks , Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable , Martin Sugioarto , Adam Strohl Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:51:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig15EDE7E87D143076CC6F0684 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote: > On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700 >> schrieb Adam Strohl : >> >>> I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then >>> recompiling/reinstalling everything "just because" and then are >>> complaining when one thing breaks (its the only thing I can think of)= =2E >> >> Hi. >> >> But it does not need to break. Sometimes it would be enough just to >> test if the port compiles before committing it (I'm talking about >> libreoffice here which is broken). Some people rely on some essential >> ports. I can understand that porters are not Gods and make errors, but= >> they should be fixed within hours, when they have been found on >> important ports. >> >> I mean, ports collection is sure great and this is one of the aspects >> why I am using FreeBSD, but at the moment FreeBSD is losing strength >> here, in my opinion. >=20 > Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will > creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to different > configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is quite > frankly insulting-- it built on a clean system perfectly well. >=20 > Chris In do not see any insulting statement! Why those exaggerations? --------------enig15EDE7E87D143076CC6F0684 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1Hw/AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8cEkH/26QrmQtdrNN5o64khlnzAr1 3VddvdICFh/Pdx1Rl3dYk3hYz8PGBOYVYF5UQrNUTc+/5n7NJgMYGq2mwJ0dCawE +18f2K7/RN/e+WLTmuCC2FjowDB7Rjpq9EjGoNq/37mj2NC15LwXXJVi22ont9nb HgnV7qf7UsOf8lX3QWRPSdkYK97dtauDvdryzKHyRrIfQD3PetPVzXP/fNzOrgvA Xw4gsCxeY54VxhTf5RsaEeR82ddr9XVSWCKjAyWWtAplQ2kYkNKIfpGninkX+auM pzk3MJofygj735Xqaxjl5qouQlNXw+47qnTnzm29XV7vhNUPbCbMNLAvWt+SgIY= =7tek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig15EDE7E87D143076CC6F0684--