From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 29 20:27:04 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD935106566C;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.161.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4E78FC0C;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:27:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so6206452fxe.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=mODxD/H1/CKmvsVjFheaesoHlMBeEb4JYbwlRL9JCsU=;
	b=vPQYWlrvxMgP0Hg2mpDL8YSmNImf8WlmddDHVvUHJUX+99uf9/yoi+lxtS9XKrMmv3
	tgDtMLSRYeN9JP7F89yyuu1yeWp2FzlDLMhDRr4LG8OPhia+lcu/kVTSwJUS6fxR/WgN
	cSJkGGDP6NVVlTDicxuq3in3Wu7OivwVWhTk4=
Received: by 10.223.88.193 with SMTP id b1mr64716fam.40.1314647912380;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from limbo.lan ([195.225.157.86])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm4018342fai.44.2011.08.29.12.58.31
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:58:29 +0300
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
	rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:03:20 +0000
Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:27:04 -0000

27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

I think this one would better look like list of major features with os 
comparison, like:

= Networking =
  * IPv6: major support, best stack around.
  * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. 
ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet).

= Data storage =
  * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux 
has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has 
dynamic disks since XP (?features).

= SMP =
  * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some 
rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like 
DragonflyBSD and QNX).

  If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison 
with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD 
over other systems.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.