From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jan 22 9:20: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555B237B400 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0MHK1U48048; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201221720.g0MHK1U48048@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: bin/34158: High NATD cpu usage Reply-To: Ruslan Ermilov Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/34158; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Niels Piersma Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/34158: High NATD cpu usage Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:17:58 +0200 On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:29:34AM -0800, Niels Piersma wrote: > FreeBSD mpogw.mpo.local 4.4-RELEASE > > NATD tops at 99,99% CPU load after about two days. (reported by > top) result is a very slow machine and it needs to be rebooted. > This is a Celly400 with 64Mb of RAM running IMAP, sendmail and > NATD/IPFW. > Do you also have dummynet pipes configured on this box? How does your "ipfw show" output look like? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message