From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 30 18:43:30 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F43C106564A
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C612D8FC13
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2B878CCF;
	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2UIhRJp093379;
	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:28 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:31:56 MST."
	<8321954E-5CFF-45F9-9F87-BE83659E4C8D@mac.com> 
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:27 +0000
Message-ID: <93378.1238438607@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: On errno 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:30 -0000

In message <8321954E-5CFF-45F9-9F87-BE83659E4C8D@mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri
tes:

>With so many drivers returning ENXIO whenever something (i.e
>anything) is wrong, how meaningful is ENXIO in diagnosing
>problems?
>
>What do the various standards dictate or allow us to do?

Long time ago, I proposed a scheme where a process can register
a userland error-text buffer with the kernel.

Whenever a system call returns with error, the kernel has the
opportunity to write an explanatory text in the registered
buffer (if there is one).

That is not only backwards and standards compatible, but it is also
much more expressive than errno.

If we start with teaching err(3) function about it, we even get
a lot of coverage right away.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.