From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 2 12:50:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F4337B401 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.utcorp.com (mail.utcorp.com [146.145.135.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0417743EC2 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:50:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kseel@utcorp.com) Received: from utcorp.com (shorty30.khome.utcorp.net [10.200.1.30]) by mail.utcorp.com (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h02LOK9k094532 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:24:21 GMT (envelope-from kseel@utcorp.com) Message-ID: <3E14A60D.9000704@utcorp.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:50:21 -0500 From: kseel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020906 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Quad ethernet question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone using one of these? http://www.corpsys.com/store/prodinfo.asp?number=ANA6944&variation=&aitem=60&mitem=62 If so, is the performance good? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message