From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:08:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1290B16A506 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA5013C45D for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4P8d-0007Yg-VR; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:08:12 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4PAg-000B5B-1b; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:10:18 +0300 To: Divacky Roman References: <57417212@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070108180014.GA4540@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20070108210813.368389dc@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070109204604.62915dc7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <89565167@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109213151.2bf5a8f3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <46677978@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <80597611@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109210536.GA35880@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <55639944@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109215858.GA38499@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:10:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20070109215858.GA38499@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:58:58 +0100") Message-ID: <23477685@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PARTIAL SOLUTION] broken linuxulator in -current as of Jan 8 17:51:45 CET X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:08:17 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:58:58 +0100 Divacky Roman wrote: > this is extremelly strange. I am struggling now with acroread (problems with pango) but overall it looks > like almost working > I also tried current from August 1st (ie. before ANY of the 2.6 stuff got commited) and ls doesnt work. > does anyone see any explanation for this? Maybe since the FreeBSD librt was introduced (Mar 1 2006) nobody tried linux ls without chroot? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve