Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:00:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jim Trigg" <jtrigg@spamcop.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Openssl 0.9.8 incompatibility Message-ID: <3059.192.168.1.2.1128016817.squirrel@mail.scadian.net> In-Reply-To: <1399.192.168.1.2.1128015775.squirrel@mail.scadian.net> References: <1399.192.168.1.2.1128015775.squirrel@mail.scadian.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:42 pm, Jim Trigg wrote: > Well, apparently openssl 0.9.8 is more fragile than 0.9.7g; two of my > installed ports won't rebuild with it. There's an easy workaround for > security/cyrus-sasl2 -- make it with WITHOUT_NTLM defined. I haven't > figured out exactly how comms/kermit broke, though. OK, found it. In adding PSS to rsa, openssl 0.9.8 uses EM as a variable name, and kermit uses it as a defined constant. My personal recommendation would be to change rsa_pss.c and rsa.h in openssl to use something either lowercase or less generic, but I can think of an ugly hack to kermit to get around it as well. (My current workaround is after installing openssl to modify $PREFIX/include/openssl/rsa.h to use PSS_EM instead of EM.) Should I submit this as a PR (and should I submit it upstream, or would the maintainer deal with that)? Thanks, Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3059.192.168.1.2.1128016817.squirrel>