From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jul 21 10:23:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr2.ruhr.de [141.39.224.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF8D137BD97 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:23:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 62124 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2000 17:25:26 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA73962; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:54:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ue) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:54:51 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Ben Smithurst Subject: Re: man.cgi links in FAQ Message-ID: <20000721185451.H66732@nathan.ruhr.de> Reply-To: doc@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:26:57PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Does anyone have a good reason why these can't be taken out and shot Well, ammo *is* expensive :-) > replaced with the &man.foo.1; entities, I think it's a good idea. Yodel if you'd like some help. You'll have to complete the list of man entities first. See my next mail. > Ditto for ports.cgi links? I guess would be a suitable > replacement for a lot of those. Either or , we don't have the necessary &man.foo.x; entities for them. /s/Udo -- "What part of no don't you understand?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message