From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun May 31 15:16:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F741337221 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 15:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.49.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "gromit.dlib.vt.edu", Issuer "Chumby Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Zhjg37t6z4FVB for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from mather.gromit23.net (c-98-244-101-97.hsd1.va.comcast.net [98.244.101.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07C0D3C1; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:16:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Mather Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Subject: Re: BeagleBone AI Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 11:16:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org To: Sulev-Madis Silber References: <54BFDAE5-67CF-4033-BD38-3F38F7FE70F8@cyclaero.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Zhjg37t6z4FVB X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=vt.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.173.49.70) smtp.mailfrom=paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.45 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.71)[0.711]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.40)[0.402]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[98.244.101.97:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.83)[0.833]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hot.ee]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1312, ipnet:128.173.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[vt.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 15:16:56 -0000 On May 30, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Sulev-Madis Silber = wrote: > worth mentioning anyway, as ideas kept to oneself are useless ideas >=20 >=20 > somehow noone else has replied so far, including ones i consider more > competent on subject >=20 > to me, ti am* soc seems like solid option. unsure if one wants to use > c.o.t.s. board for industrial use, though? i mean as opposed to = designing > own pcb >=20 > when others finally arrive, they might want to correct me, but next > platform to consider (fbsd-support-wise) could be imx6 >=20 > then there are allwinner socs which seem to be like more oriented = towards > consumer mobile devices and rpi-class (media players?) >=20 > but nothing stops one from "abusing" readily available hw, if you = ruggedize > it and take appropriate precautions :) Note that there is an industrial version of the BeagleBone Black: = https://beagleboard.org/arrowbbbi Cheers, Paul.