From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 18 23:40:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta3.snfc21.pbi.net (mta3.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71D414DCB for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:40:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jazepeda@pacbell.net) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org ([207.214.149.154]) by mta3.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8) with ESMTP id <0FLF0026ZP9PS1@mta3.snfc21.pbi.net> for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611899154E; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:39:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:39:25 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda Subject: Re: PATCH for testing In-reply-to: <199911190738.AAA31331@harmony.village.org> To: Warner Losh Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Alex Zepeda writes: > : Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin* > > No. -e, -a, -U are all use for the sysadmin. They can provide > sensitive information, so should have sensible access policies placed > upon their use. While the current set of access policies may be less > than idea, it doesn't militate for their complete removal. Erk. That came out wrong. I meant removal for non root or perhaps non gid wheel? or somesuch. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message