From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Dec 11 9: 0:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4331537B41E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBBH04r71848; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200112111700.fBBH04r71848@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: misc/32687: scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d not executed in 4.4-STABLE Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/32687; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Peter Pentchev Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/32687: scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d not executed in 4.4-STABLE Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:00:07 +0200 On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:51:49 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > This makes sense. How about the attached patch? > The warning message clutters the output, though; it almost certainly > overflows to the next line on the screen, not to mention overflowing > the 80-character source line.. I am thinking of shortening it somehow, > maybe you or somebody else could suggest another wording? I'd suggest removing the warning altogether. Anyone who's managed to mangle things in a 4.5-RELEASE upgrade to the point where they see this message is unlikely to know how to make it go away. I like the rest of the patch. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message