Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:30:01 +0200 From: Terje Elde <terje@elde.net> To: Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide Message-ID: <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16. aug. 2013, at 19:17, Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk> wrote: > Has anyone actually done this, and if so, how? This is wrong on so many levels, and you'll have to work around all og them. Yes, you can use nat, but what about adress-resolution? And so on. If it's a specific thing you need to work - a spesific server for example - nat can work, but if you need general bridging, best to avoid conflicts. Note that there are alternatives, such as L2-bridging rather than L3. If you explain a bit more of the setup, and what you need to work, it'd be easier to suggest something. Right now, we know bits of the setup, but not really what problem(s) you're trying to solve. Terje
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181>
