From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 13:05:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728E437B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F0343F85 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:05:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GK5E1f031952 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:05:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h5GK5ET7031951 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:05:14 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GK1wHh091586 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:01:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306162001.h5GK1wHh091586@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:01:58 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_NO_LOWER version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: CTM - any users left? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:05:17 -0000 Hi all Last time I looked, we had _very_ few CTM users. Is there any reason that the CTM stuff should not be a port? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH