Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:25:38 +0300 From: Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko <doublef@tele-kom.ru> To: zhangweiwu@realss.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scheduling priority not working? Message-ID: <20040301172538.56294112@Hal.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <Law11-F26DplxgM2x1T000162a5@hotmail.com> References: <Law11-F26DplxgM2x1T000162a5@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:07:12 +0800
"Zhang Weiwu" <weiwuzhang@hotmail.com> probably wrote:
> nice(1) is just what I learned from school; school books are
> often not very practical these days.
> STANDARDS
> The nice utility conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (``POSIX.1'').
>
> HISTORY
> A nice utility appeared in Version 4 AT&T UNIX.
nice(1) is standard, and {id|rt}prio(1) are specific to FreeBSD. So
don't blame school books. If they say they describe a POSIX system,
well, that's what they do.
BTW, why does it say `*A* nice utility'?
--
DoubleF
Waste not, get your budget cut next year.
--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAQ0ftwo7hT/9lVdwRAl7JAJ9I53llEQeztzn268uXg5tANB0GagCfTvT5
00R2mh0fwzDh3i2rs5uo2y4=
=+eI+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040301172538.56294112>