From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 16 16:05:40 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C562A106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dieterbsd@engineer.com)
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com (mailout-us.gmx.com [74.208.5.67])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93EAB8FC0C
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 5280 invoked by uid 0); 16 Apr 2012 16:05:33 -0000
Received: from 67.206.183.41 by rms-us017 with HTTP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:05:29 -0400
From: "Dieter BSD" <dieterbsd@engineer.com>
Message-ID: <20120416160531.155070@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Authenticated: #74169980
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer
x-registered: 0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: HCb+b/dd3zOlNR3dAHAhvZx+IGRvb0CY
Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:05:40 -0000

Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base.

Why?

Don't optional tools belong in ports?