From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 19:10:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16157FD for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugene@home.wdc.spb.ru) Received: from mail.wdc.spb.ru (mail.wdc.spb.ru [IPv6:2001:470:df2f:face::23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD289AB for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wdc.spb.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wdc.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9A92151453 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:10:07 +0400 (MSK) Received: by mail.wdc.spb.ru (Postfix, from userid 66) id 0EF0E2151451; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:10:07 +0400 (MSK) Received: from home.wdc.spb.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.wdc.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1E9272C19 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:05:37 +0400 (MSK) Received: from home.wdc.spb.ru (home.my.intranet [192.168.2.1]) by home.wdc.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7933272C18 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:05:36 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <51154C80.9090108@home.wdc.spb.ru> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:05:36 +0400 From: "Eugene V. Boontseff" Organization: warm home company User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can not install libreoffice 3.6.5 from the port. References: <5114FC5A.6000704@home.wdc.spb.ru> <1360335682483-5785029.post@n5.nabble.com> <1360335824098-5785030.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1360335824098-5785030.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: eugene@wdc.spb.ru List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:10:09 -0000 On 08.02.2013 19:03, Jakub Lach wrote: > I was looking in wrong place, but solution stands, -ljawt looks java related > and there was Java fix in 3.6.5_1 > > 3.6.5_1 is Ok. thanks. -- Eugene