From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 23:59:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91B31065676 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685368FC22 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so9749443rvf.43 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=W/WLuyiDkOEYMm5bE5vusM0j1QxH4D/M7MZjkQtUWDg=; b=B7ViXVakS7J9Dl6pnYW+bWssVnE6M6gv/NdWC8dfCLHLUlH0mHxJU+gJydcbEKK/u0 mCpgX5npikNTxPdd61XsNh8iunh3q1gMmZngdAWJaYfsoOyKK04FvjU+OG7KiU+Ftkze 2l1QKHb6NNj22rmk153AkdbnRum+Bb/hh95Js= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=wgmYZXWlbyzXhRIYTMhaJ3urMXAC7MQruUCywwbhoI5ehxoRdMV1TW+Pu5nsuSP6sM 1opK8s3Q4o5Sx2O7TXgdfn1zObrj6nSpPtsTMh7+pfcMZbk46CXtDmw8YQ6ycWwlD4Ba XHZERnrAXODxFQzqivvL5rmMKZ+mKujkbw/WA= Received: by 10.141.189.4 with SMTP id r4mr13647442rvp.98.1214265547070; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm12987804rvf.9.2008.06.23.16.59.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m5NNuvD0055696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:56:57 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id m5NNurm3055695; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:56:53 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:56:53 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Tim Nelson Message-ID: <20080623235653.GC55552@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> <485FCBD1.8020807@fudnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <485FCBD1.8020807@fudnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Kage , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem0 frame error X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:59:07 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:14:09AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote: > Kage wrote: > > > >Marius Strobl wrote: > > > >>With what version of FreeBSD is this? > >> > >>Marius > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn > >about > >systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this > >system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT > >half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I > >checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I > >have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. > >Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good > >switch fixed the problem completely. > > > >At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! > > > >(It is 7.0-release, by the way) > > > Regardless... shouldn't the driver properly deal with being plugged into > a 10BT Half-Duplex environment? Yes, it should. At least we know there is an issue on 10Mbps link with gem(4). Marius may have better idea as he touched gem(4) recently. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon