From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 17 15:33: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26BF1532C; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:32:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA98700; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:32:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , dg@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipflow and ipfirewall In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:41:57 +0200." <19990317104157.A4028@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:32:08 -0800 Message-ID: <98698.921713528@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I just complained why David didn't document this feature when it > was committed. Unfortunately, there was no response from him. > Probably, he's very busy now. So, I ask _you_ to document this > feature for others... not for me. I already understand how it > does work. I think the point he was trying to really make (it's always fun watching non-native speakers argue in English :-) is that any arbitrary value of "you" is *always* too busy, so if you really want it to happen the best way is to submit the diffs or full docs or whatever. As you yourself just pointed out, you understand how it works and that makes you an ideal candidate to document it when others are clearly too busy to do so. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message