Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:36:26 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa npx.c Message-ID: <66391.1035178586@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:04:13 %2B1000." <20021021110058.Y8562-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20021021110058.Y8562-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> phk 2002/10/20 10:30:30 PDT >> >> Modified files: >> sys/i386/isa npx.c >> Log: >> Hide inline assembly if lint is defined. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.133 +1 -1 src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c > >Inline assembly was already correctly hidden by a __GNUC__ ifdef. It >is a feature that broken lints which define __GNUC__ without actually >being supporting all features of gcc barf on unsupported features. >Please back this out. Our kernel is too __GNUC__ infected to making linting it without defining __GNUC__ an option. At the present time, no other compiler stands a chance at compiling our kernel, and it therefore seems far more productive to be able to run lint on the code we have and use, than the code we don't have and don't use. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66391.1035178586>