From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 9 08:50:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEB916A420; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768FE43D79; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k198oSxn074019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:50:29 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id k198oSRR074013; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:50:28 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:50:27 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <20060209085027.GV877@cell.sick.ru> References: <200601110030.k0B0UPOx009098@repoman.freebsd.org> <200601121847.08044@harrymail> <20060112220112.GE83922@FreeBSD.org> <200602081730.35748.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602081730.35748.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, scottl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:50:32 -0000 Harald, On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:30:34PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: H> Thanks for your work, I saw that you merged the VLAN code some time ago to H> RELENG_6. Is there any chance that the taskqueue code and then the new em H> code will make it into 6.1? H> I'd really love to see my em's shifting more than 130mbit/s with ftp... ;) This is question to Scott, not to me. AFAIK, Scott has plans to merge taskqueue code to RELENG_6 before release, but he is busy with other tasks. JFYI, I have a router on 6.0-STABLE, where I have merged all Scott's commits to taskqueue and I'm using this new taskqueue API to run pf(4) periodic tasks out of swi5 context. So the new taskqueue works fine on RELENG_6. However, straight merge is not acceptable since old API should be left too, for compatibility. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE