From owner-freebsd-small Fri Jun 15 7:34:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from subtopia.informationwave.net (subtopia.informationwave.net [199.74.235.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1571337B40A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from missnglnk@informationwave.net) Received: by subtopia.informationwave.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id C388C1C982; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:26:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:26:50 -0400 From: Omachonu Ogali To: "Nathan Vidican" Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of PicoBSD Message-ID: <20010615102650.A2333@subtopia.informationwave.net> References: <200106151314.f5FDEPo08741@mail.ipsnetwork.net> <20010615101216.A2201@subtopia.informationwave.net> <000401c0f5a6$d760b770$6700000a@78lb019> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000401c0f5a6$d760b770$6700000a@78lb019>; from nathan@vidican.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote: > I know of people running PicoBSD built from FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE sources, as > well as 4.3-RELEASE, so it shouldn't be broken? You'll need the FreeBSD > source-code on a machine mounted to /usr/src, in order to build picobsd. This is what concerns me: $ ls -la /usr/src/release/picobsd/build/build ls: /usr/src/release/picobsd/build/build: No such file or directory And after taking a look at the CVS tree, it seems the build script was checked into the attic, is there now a new way of building PicoBSD? > Nathan Vidican > Nathan@Vidican.com > http://Nathan.Vidican.com/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Omachonu Ogali" > To: > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:12 AM > Subject: Re: State of PicoBSD > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:14:25AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote: > > > > Out of curiousity, what's the current state of PicoBSD? > > > > -- > > > > Omachonu Ogali > > > > missnglnk@informationwave.net > > > > http://www.informationwave.net > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > The 'status' could be summed up as fairly complete I'd say. For the most > > > part, PicoBSD users are using it for some custom purpose. You can build > > > your own copy of PicoBSD using just about any post 3.0 release of > > > FreeBSD with the sources currently commited to the tree. I've been told > > > it can be done with 2.X branches as well, but have never tried to > > > personally. > > > In summation, I'd have to say that it's complete; as complete as it > > > will be for now. Like the standard release of FreeBSD, improvements, and > > > additions will most likely continue onward in the future... but PicoBSD > > > is definetly alive and doing well as-is. > > > > Well, I wanted to know if it was broken or working in -STABLE, > > because it looks like it's broken to me in -CURRENT. > > > > > -- > > > Nathan Vidican > > > Nathan@Vidican.com > > > http://Nathan.Vidic > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > > > > -- > > Omachonu Ogali > > missnglnk@informationwave.net > > http://www.informationwave.net > > > > -- Omachonu Ogali missnglnk@informationwave.net http://www.informationwave.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message