Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:32:25 -0800
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com>
Cc:        Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>, beezarliu <beezarliu@yahoo.com.cn>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: igb driver RX (was TX) hangs when out of mbuf clusters
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikaFRh-3OK0xjO8a%2BnY5aoPnMVFGPCnR1CGDVPk@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinaftP09MxxpXQwhLaO3dybSep2q4SWZRP4ycHB@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTikrjkHDaBq%2Bx6MTZhzOeqWA=xtFpqQPsthFGmuf@mail.gmail.com> <D70A2DA6-23B7-442D-856C-4267359D66A5@lurchi.franken.de> <AANLkTinLg6QZz67e3Hhda-bzTX69XWNcdEkr3EZHFmSZ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikMuFRY=W0%2BVtGKdWkJcOFVbdy=OOZNe_xFUC3R@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin5DZBnr_VcXRyUmpcH2Gsr3GuaW4EsBtKJ6omd@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinaftP09MxxpXQwhLaO3dybSep2q4SWZRP4ycHB@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm, well so much for that theory :)

Jack


On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Karim Fodil-Lemelin <
fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> 2011/2/8 Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
>
>
>> I have been following this, and thinking about it. I still am working from
>> a theoretical
>> standpoint, but based on a patch I got quite a long time back and never
>> quite groked,
>> I believe now that I might have a solution.
>>
>> The original PR and patch was kern/150516 from Beezar Liu,  I was never
>> quite comfortable
>> with the code changes, nor convinced that it was a real issue and not a
>> misunderstanding.
>> However I think now that this very report might be behind what we are
>> seeing today. I have
>> a slightly different approach to solving it, of course it remains to be
>> seen if it handles it
>> properly.
>>
>> Please try the patch I've attached, I'm open to further correction or
>> polishing of the
>> changes. And thanks to Beezar for his original report and changes, this is
>> not for em,
>> but if this eliminates the problem its clearly needed in all drivers.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>> Hi Jack,
>
> Thanks for your help. I tried your patch and it didn't work so I added a
> couple of printf to see if the added code was getting hit:
>
> --- a/freebsd/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c
> --More--(byte 1253)+++ b/freebsd/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ igb_attach(device_t dev)
>             device_get_nameunit(dev));
>
>         INIT_DEBUGOUT("igb_attach: end");
> -
> +       printf("this driver has a patch from Jack Vogel\n");
>         return (0);
>
>  err_late:
> @@ -4131,6 +4131,7 @@ igb_rxeof(struct igb_queue *que, int count, int
> *done)
>                 struct mbuf             *sendmp, *mh, *mp;
>                 struct igb_rx_buf       *rxbuf;
>                 u16                     hlen, plen, hdr, vtag;
> +               int                     commit;
>                 bool                    eop = FALSE;
>
>                 cur = &rxr->rx_base[i];
> @@ -4255,10 +4256,23 @@ next_desc:
>                 bus_dmamap_sync(rxr->rxdma.dma_tag, rxr->rxdma.dma_map,
>                     BUS_DMASYNC_PREREAD | BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE);
>
> +               commit = i;     /* capture the old index */
> +
>                 /* Advance our pointers to the next descriptor. */
>                 if (++i == adapter->num_rx_desc)
>                         i = 0;
>                 /*
> +               ** Sanity test for ring full, if this
> +               ** happens we need to refresh immediately
> +               ** or refresh may deadlock.
> +               */
> +               if (i == rxr->next_to_refresh) {
> +                       igb_refresh_mbufs(rxr, commit);
> +                       printf("igb_refresh_mbufs called with commit %d\n",
> commit);
> +                       processed = 0;
> +               }
> +
> +               /*
>                 ** Send to the stack or LRO
>                 */
>                 if (sendmp != NULL) {
>
> Here is the results:
>
> # dmesg | grep Vogel
> this driver has a patch from Jack Vogel
> this driver has a patch from Jack Vogel
>
> # netstat -m
> 60453/52707/113160 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> 48416/51584/100000/100000 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
> 2894/690 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
> 11946/854/12800/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use
> (current/cache/total/max)
> 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
> 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
> 164834K/119760K/284595K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
> 0/339/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
> 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
> 0/4/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
> 0 requests for sfbufs denied
> 0 requests for sfbufs delayed
> 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> # dmesg | grep commit
>
> At this point RX has hung.
>
> Somehow the check (i == rxr->next_to_refresh) is never true in this case.
> Also, I did read kern/150516 and couldn't wrap my head around the patch for
> the em driver that Beezar Liu suggested.
>
> Regards,
>
> Karim.
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikaFRh-3OK0xjO8a%2BnY5aoPnMVFGPCnR1CGDVPk>