From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun May 20  8:16:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.noos.fr (descartes.noos.net [212.198.2.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4090137B422
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 20 May 2001 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from clefevre@poboxes.com)
Received: (qmail 3590760 invoked by uid 0); 20 May 2001 15:16:12 -0000
Received: from d165.dhcp212-198-231.noos.fr (HELO gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.231.165]) (envelope-sender <clefevre@poboxes.com>)
          by descartes.noos.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; 20 May 2001 15:16:12 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by gits.dyndns.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4KFGA581820;
	Sun, 20 May 2001 17:16:11 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from clefevre@poboxes.com)
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: pr=26976
References: <04e401c0e06e$460486a0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[<<r#uCVjK"~Ke!@0vxS/.,wki/c|uVnNV!BA-_gY2sfoGc3
        f{#/$PT>97Zd*>^#%Y5Cxv;%Y[PT-LW3;A:fRrJ8+^k"e7@+30g0YD0*^^3jgyShN7o?a]C
        la*Zv'5NA,=963bM%J^o]C
Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@poboxes.com>
In-Reply-To: <04e401c0e06e$460486a0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@noos.fr>
Date: 20 May 2001 17:16:08 +0200
Message-ID: <3da0126f.fsf@gits.dyndns.org>
Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

"David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> writes:

> Anyone know what should be done with this.  Currently linux_base can't be
> fetched.  The pr above fixes this but is also a major upgrade.  I won't dare
> suggest linue_base7 like I did samba22, but does anyone have any
> reservations about this pr?

about linux_base, how about just changing the following variable ?

STDDIR=                 linux/${PORTVERSION}/en/os/${MACHINE_ARCH}/RedHat/RPMS
UPDDIR=                 linux/updates/${PORTVERSION}/en/os/${MACHINE_ARCH}

PS : I didn't check the rest.

about the port naming, linux_base70 would be more appropriate, no ?
does redhat 7.0 (or 7.1) are enough stable to replace redhat 6.1 ?

Cyrille.
--
home: mailto:clefevre@poboxes.com   UNIX is user-friendly; it's just particular
work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr   about who it chooses to be friends with.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message