From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 13:37:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 1914B37B404; Tue, 13 May 2003 13:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BE337B401 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 13:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B2643F85 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 13:37:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10171 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 20:37:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 13 May 2003 20:37:50 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx ([216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4DKbmp0028584; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:37:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030513200708.BE6F42A7EA@canning.wemm.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:37:56 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Wemm cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 31043 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:37:52 -0000 On 13-May-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 13-May-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: >> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=31043 >> > >> > Change 31043 by peter@peter_hammer on 2003/05/12 19:08:19 >> > >> > And now for something completely different... i386 binary emulation! >> > This was submitted by p4/i386 on the amd64 box itself! >> >> Can we possibly have a shared compat/ia32? syscalls.master should be >> able to be shared for example. > > Yes. I think compat/freebsd32 (generic 32 bit on 64 bit platform) and > compat/ia32 (x86 specifically) is the right breakup. And the truely MD > parts go in $arch/compat/ia32. *nod* > the syscalls etc. Anyway, it was a useful validation of the context switch > stuff. pmap is more urgent. Yes, pmap is indeed much more urgent. :) -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/