Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:37:56 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 31043 for review Message-ID: <XFMail.20030513163756.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030513200708.BE6F42A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13-May-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 13-May-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: >> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=31043 >> > >> > Change 31043 by peter@peter_hammer on 2003/05/12 19:08:19 >> > >> > And now for something completely different... i386 binary emulation! >> > This was submitted by p4/i386 on the amd64 box itself! >> >> Can we possibly have a shared compat/ia32? syscalls.master should be >> able to be shared for example. > > Yes. I think compat/freebsd32 (generic 32 bit on 64 bit platform) and > compat/ia32 (x86 specifically) is the right breakup. And the truely MD > parts go in $arch/compat/ia32. *nod* > the syscalls etc. Anyway, it was a useful validation of the context switch > stuff. pmap is more urgent. Yes, pmap is indeed much more urgent. :) -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030513163756.jhb>