From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 20 06:38:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9451065677 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8565D8FC18 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so4773601pbb.13 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:38:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=GB42fsu1psLrKWlFeVT2oG9VCcYOOozRZbpco0HeR6I=; b=r08+qZDbOWIRqhRT+wur+4R/PuUji2OGZ5M8u1E1BSyMoygnnlLZjUhSYndfDPIM4P Pdgsl/Bt8f5hyzJDt6X1AqHt/S0r7ZvcI3y4ffj+q2a7RKXsjZrBncMfYKEYGkFpus2/ uBGPaVvRXAvvt06SmtETalIwFIR2LC5IVhVlSOaDuCJpy11Tl9r/qVzSquOehpIkg6yf X7QJ9zoFGPANmANMXRtSNQsYjwnRwRJjaR+Q+0XZXvHJIfJq1z+clytF5i06GHSuC2SX whNc8sDMpKXj79SL6I3DAWVG4i3Rku2vbmn2i/BcVhidZT3tG4GRhHu73d+FySxl2n1j 0ttA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.225.3 with SMTP id rg3mr300388pbc.27.1348123079972; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.36.106 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:37:59 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QWu-pJFR7_dkpD4Pw5i8vENVxxI Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [CFT] filtered frames support is now in -HEAD, please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:38:06 -0000 Hi all, I've finished pushing the filtered frames support into -HEAD and I've flipped it on. I've also found a couple of strange interactions with BAR (which are likely BAR bugs in the first place) which I've also committed a workaround for until I can fix net80211. There's a bunch of possible gotchas that can occur with this code (mostly showing up as traffic stalls) so I'd really appreciate it if people would update to -HEAD and give it a right and thorough test. I'm doing as thorough testing as I can with my current test setup. Who knows what other weird bugs will lurk in this code. Thanks, Adrian