From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 13:16:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9ECB106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A078FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so367768bwz.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=ndookuviQiFx7MQ7bi72Y0EHKKTr6fK4GKuu1eO6yQY=; b=GIMbYjw+2I2uzvn2OylZiDXH5cCzhvelPMZArpcu5D66fapZxeZC9O7SpVC+tgECNK gkjDMYd1uXs0NibzQ1cHI6IzagcN75c/5nmwkAXzF5OQtvAajO3Jxy58Kce4BU9OuzG2 YJ6J7zc0DKISp2AzZRdx+/cKnPd0qpPbtcXKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=bzWtP5c6oTC8httApfJg0I2CDLDTT+60ERZ+gErllMg2nVKzvwGcKYwnS9ubYO+ekd Nbee98QTgiBuG3e0Fmcb7szIk5wAQVkpcveOhU57XtTimzS6AWc5Cx+kctqQULYn6jvk pNZrJVdjEmD6rYJ3h3PVy3UTErVOy6G0AyqO4= Received: by 10.204.46.134 with SMTP id j6mr7098920bkf.112.1293110192222; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:02 +0000 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 -0000 On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock wrote: > > Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I > thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting > feelers out, though :) > Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a 939? Sorry you're not having much luck. If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, but that's better left to someone more local for you! Hope you get some results soon. Chris