Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:54:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191208] New: x11-clocks/asclock-xlib Message-ID: <bug-191208-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 Bug ID: 191208 Summary: x11-clocks/asclock-xlib Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: marino@FreeBSD.org We're starting a make a push at eliminating INTERACTIVE ports. This one is a hybrid where a package can be produced with PACKAGE_BUILDING set. It seems to me that this port could easily have IS_INTERACTIVE removed by making the PACKAGE_BUILDING targets run unconditionally. Can we do that? Is there some kind of tremendous benefit for this port to be run interactively? From an earlier PR, it seems that reason for the hybrid is to eliminate a dependency on imake, but that seems like a cure thats worse than the disease to me... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191208-13>