From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jul 22 17:17:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA23865
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA23858;
          Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id RAA23074; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607230016.RAA23074@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com
CC: jhs@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.95.960722233225.312A-100000@klemm.gtn.com> (message from Andreas Klemm on Mon, 22 Jul 1996 23:44:00 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: print/gs4
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I vote for _not_ to differentiate in different gs versions:
 * 	/usr/local/bin/gs
 * 	/usr/local/bin/gs3
 * 	/usr/local/bin/gs4
 * 
 * Say NO ;-) Any comments ?! Surely some ?!

I agree with Andreas.  No reason to make life unnecesarrily
complicated.

That this software is NOT covered by GPL is clearly stated in
pkg/DESCR, what is the problem?

Satoshi